ScrapeDO Alternatives: 5 SERP & Scraping APIs Tested (2026)

Scrape.do, often typed as one word (ScrapeDO), sits at the cheap end of the SERP-scraping market. It sells a rendered page at the lowest published CPM in the category, $0.70–$1.16 per 1,000 requests. Parsing, pagination, AI Overview reconstruction and retry logic are yours. That split is exactly right when raw HTML is what you need, and pure overhead when what you want is a parsed Google response.

So the question behind any Scrape.do alternative search (or ScrapeDO alternative, the same question spelled differently) is whether you need cheap raw bytes or structured SERP JSON. Teams looking for ScrapeDO alternatives in 2026 tend to want one of two things. Some want an even cheaper raw scraper. The rest never wanted to build and babysit a SERP parser in the first place, and would rather have organic results, ads, People Also Ask and AI Overview handed back as clean JSON.

We tested five.

The 5 best Scrape.do alternatives at a glance

Tool	Model	Entry price	Google SERP rate (~1k)	AI Overview
cloro	Parsed AI-native SERP API	$30/mo (free tier: 500 credits/mo)	$1.25–$2.00 /1k (n=10 + AIO)	✅ deep, default
Scrape.do	Raw-HTML SERP scraper	$29/mo	$0.70–$1.16 /1k (raw HTML)	❌ not rendered
ScraperAPI	Credit-based scraper	$49/mo (1k free credits)	25 credits/call ($12 /1k Google)	❌ no AIO
ScrapingBee	Headless-browser scraper	$49/mo (1k free credits)	credit-multiplier dependent	❌ no AIO
Bright Data	Proxy + SERP layer	PAYG; Business ~$999/mo	~$1–$1.50 /1k (Google, high end)	⚠️ not a clean field
Decodo (ex-Smartproxy)	Budget proxy + SERP API	from ~$0.32 /1k	$0.32–$0.95 /1k	❌ no AIO

Two things separate these tools for anyone replacing Scrape.do: whether you get parsed SERP JSON or raw access you parse yourself, and whether the AI Overview block comes back as a structured field or not at all. Scrape.do sits at the raw-HTML, no-AIO end of both, and every alternative below moves along one axis or the other.

How we tested, and what these numbers rest on

Comparison pages are easy to write and hard to trust, so here is the basis for every claim above.

The cloro rows are measured. On 2026-08-19 we ran 15 AI-Overview-prone commercial and informational queries through cloro’s Google endpoint. 14 of the 15 returned a fully parsed AI Overview object, carrying the answer text, a markdown rendering, sources, citationPills, relatedLinks and videos, at a mean of 8.5 sources per overview. That run is the evidence behind cloro’s AI Overview column. One implementation detail if you benchmark us yourself: the field populates only when include.aioverview is sent, and without that flag it is absent whether or not Google rendered an overview, which produces a convincing-looking zero.

The Scrape.do and other vendor rows come from each vendor’s own documentation and pricing pages, linked inline throughout. We did not run those APIs under our own keys for this comparison. So read a ❌ or ⚠️ as “not documented as a first-class parsed field” rather than as a test we ran and they failed. Where a vendor has shipped something since we last checked, their documentation is the authority and this page is not.

Pricing moves and none of these figures are quotes. List prices change without notice and promotional rates are common, so treat the per-1,000 rates as the shape of the market rather than a number to budget against, and open the linked pricing page before you commit.

We make one of the products in this table. cloro is listed first because this is our site, not because a neutral panel ranked it there. The measurements above are reproducible and the competitor links go to primary sources; use both to discount our framing.

What Scrape.do is actually built for

Scrape.do is a scraping proxy built for developers. You hand it a URL and it renders the page and returns the HTML, with proxy rotation, retries and headless rendering handled behind the endpoint. Onboarding is fully self-serve: plans start at $29/month ($1.16 per 1,000) and scale to $699/month ($0.70 per 1,000) (Scrape.do pricing), the cheapest CPM among SERP-adjacent products in the April 2026 competitive analysis. There’s no sales motion, no KYC, and no minimum commitment — which is a real part of the appeal.

Where the cheapest raw-HTML CPM earns its keep

For the right workload, Scrape.do’s rate is hard to beat:

• Raw-HTML capture for archival, diffing, or non-SERP page analysis.
• Low-stakes lookups where an occasional failed request is tolerable.
• Pipelines where the team already maintains a SERP parser and isn’t tracking AI Overview.
• Cost-sensitive scrapes against a fixed page layout that doesn’t churn.

If your problem is “we need cheap rendered HTML at volume and we’ll extract what we need ourselves,” Scrape.do does that job well and you should keep it.

Where raw HTML becomes overhead

For a team that only needs parsed Google SERPs, the cheap CPM hides costs that arrive later.

The first is the parser. Scrape.do returns the rendered page, with no parsed organic[], ads[], peopleAlsoAsk[] or aioverview field, so extracting positions, sponsored sitelinks, PAA expansions and AI-generated content into structured rows is your code. It re-breaks every time Google ships a SERP layout change.

The second is that AI Overview usually isn’t in the box to begin with. Per the April 2026 analysis, Scrape.do’s returned HTML often doesn’t contain the AI Overview surface, so even a perfect parser has nothing to work on and AI-Overview-aware monitoring is a non-starter on the default surface.

The third is reliability. The same benchmark flagged Scrape.do’s success rate as trailing the parsed alternatives, and geo targeting is country-level only. Retrying failed calls eats into the CPM advantage, which means the cheapest published rate is not the cheapest delivered rate.

The alternatives below close that gap, either by being a similarly cheap raw scraper or by taking the parser-and-retry problem away entirely.

The 5 real Scrape.do alternatives, tested

1. cloro — best for parsed, AI-native SERP data

cloro’s SERP API is the inverse of Scrape.do: there’s no raw HTML to parse and no parser to maintain. One endpoint family returns parsed JSON for Google Search and News, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode, plus ChatGPT, Perplexity, Copilot, Gemini, and Grok — with the actual cited source URLs each AI surface used. Where a raw scraper hands you a page, cloro returns organic results, ads, AI Overview (with citations), People Also Ask, and related searches in a single response.

The cross-surface coverage matters because in 2026, tracking classic rank without tracking AI citations misses half of what a query returns. cloro also fits existing pipelines through n8n, Zapier, LangChain, and MCP, with no service to build first. Sync calls cover single lookups; async/batch with webhook delivery pushes large query sets back, so nothing sits polling. Geo targeting is city-level rather than Scrape.do’s country-level.

Pros: AI Overview parsed by default, with block text and cited source URLs. One API across Google and every major AI surface. Self-serve signup with a free 500-credit trial. No parser and no retry budget to maintain — Google’s layout changes don’t surface as outages on your end.

Cons: Focused on search intelligence — it doesn’t sell a raw scraper for arbitrary non-SERP pages the way Scrape.do does. Newer than the longest-running scrapers.

Pricing: Credit-based from $30/month (Lite, 37,500 credits at $0.80 per 1,000 credits), with Hobby at $100/month for 250,000 credits at $0.40 per 1,000 and rates scaling down to $0.31 per 1,000 on the largest self-serve tier and $0.25 on a custom Enterprise contract. A Google call is 3 credits at n=10, +2 with AI Overview — so n=10 + AIO is $1.25–$2.00 per 1,000 and n=100 + AIO is $5.75–$9.20 per 1,000. The entry-tier rate is a ceiling, not what you settle at. See the pricing page for full tiers.

2. ScraperAPI — developer-friendly scraper with structured endpoints

ScraperAPI is closer to Scrape.do in shape than the rest of this list: one API key, proxy rotation and retries handled for you, and structured JSON endpoints for popular targets including Google Search. It’s a natural step up for teams that want proxy-backed scraping with a bit more structure than raw HTML, without leaving the self-serve tier.

The catch is the credit model. Plans are denominated in credits, and difficult targets cost more — Google’s structured-data endpoints bill at 25 credits per request. On the $49/month Hobby plan (100,000 credits) that’s about 4,000 Google SERP calls, an effective rate near $12 per 1,000 for Google specifically. There’s no structured AI Overview field.

Pros: Self-serve, developer-first, with a free 1,000-credit tier and a 7-day trial. Structured Google endpoints (organic, ads, PAA, related) out of the box — more than Scrape.do’s raw HTML.

Cons: Credit weighting makes Google SERP calls expensive relative to a flat per-call SERP API. No AI Overview parsing. Costs swing with target difficulty.

Pricing: Hobby $49/month (100,000 credits; Google = 25 credits/call). Free 1,000 credits plus a 7-day trial.

3. ScrapingBee — headless-browser scraping with JS rendering

ScrapingBee leans on headless-browser rendering, which makes it a good fit for JavaScript-heavy targets where Scrape.do’s cheaper raw fetch struggles. Like ScraperAPI it’s a credit product, but the credit cost is driven by multipliers rather than a flat per-target rate: JavaScript rendering is ×5, premium (residential) proxies ×25, and stealth mode up to ×75. That makes the effective Google SERP cost highly dependent on which features you switch on.

Pros: Strong JS rendering for dynamic pages. Self-serve with a free 1,000-credit tier. Clean API and good docs.

Cons: The credit multipliers make hard targets — the ones that need premium proxies or stealth — expensive fast. No structured AI Overview parsing. You still extract SERP elements yourself.

Pricing: Discovery $49/month (150,000 credits) up to Enterprise $599/month (8M credits); effective Google cost depends on the JS/premium/stealth multipliers you enable.

4. Bright Data — proxy-first infrastructure with a SERP layer

Bright Data is the enterprise-scale option: 72M+ residential IPs across 195+ countries with a dedicated SERP API layered on top. If proxy scale and country coverage are the actual requirement, rather than cheap Google HTML, it leads that category. But onboarding is a sales motion (company details, KYC, volume discussion), the Business tier lands near $999/month, and AI Overview doesn’t come back as a clean parsed field. Its SERP API runs roughly $1–$1.50 per 1,000 at the high-volume end.

Pros: Proxy scale and geo coverage beyond anything else here. Enterprise compliance posture. SERP API rate is competitive at volume.

Cons: Enterprise sales-led onboarding measured in days, not minutes. Enterprise minimums unfriendly to small teams. No clean AI Overview field — you still parse the surface yourself.

Pricing: Pay-as-you-go with committed plans; Business tier near $999/month, SERP API ~$1–$1.50 per 1,000 at higher volume.

5. Decodo (formerly Smartproxy) — cheapest self-serve, closest to Scrape.do on price

Decodo (renamed from Smartproxy) is the budget answer and the closest match to Scrape.do’s price positioning. It’s a self-serve proxy network with its own SERP Scraping API, and on raw per-request price it competes directly: the Core tier starts around $0.32 per 1,000 requests, with higher tiers landing near $0.88–$0.95 per 1,000. If your only goal is “the cheapest way to pull Google results at volume” and you’re comfortable parsing them yourself, Decodo is the like-for-like swap. (Decodo has no dedicated comparison page here — it’s included on price parity alone.)

Pros: Per-request SERP price in the same band as Scrape.do. Self-serve with a 7-day free trial, and easy to start.

Cons: No structured AI Overview parsing — you handle SERP-element extraction, same as Scrape.do. Smaller ecosystem and documentation than the larger vendors.

Pricing: SERP Scraping API from ~$0.32 per 1,000 (Core) up to ~$0.95 per 1,000 on higher tiers; 7-day free trial.

Scrape.do alternatives: price and parsing compared

Headline CPMs mislead. What you actually pay is the per-1,000 rate plus the engineering that turns raw access into parsed SERP rows plus the retry budget a lower success rate forces. A $0.70/1,000 raw scraper that needs a parser you build and maintain is not cheaper than a $2/1,000 API that returns structured JSON if that parser costs you weeks.

Vendor	Model	Google SERP rate (~1k)	You parse?	AI Overview
cloro	Parsed SERP API	$1.25–$2.00 (n=10 + AIO)	No	✅ default
Scrape.do	Raw-HTML scraper	$0.70–$1.16	Yes	❌ not rendered
ScraperAPI	Credit scraper	~$12 /1k Google (25 cr/call)	Partial	❌
ScrapingBee	Headless-browser scraper	multiplier-dependent	Partial	❌
Bright Data	Proxy + SERP layer	~$1–$1.50 (Google, high end)	Mostly	⚠️ not a clean field
Decodo	Budget proxy + SERP API	$0.32–$0.95	Yes	❌

On raw rate, Decodo ($0.32–$0.95/1k) edges Scrape.do, but both hand back unparsed results with no AI Overview field. ScraperAPI is the most expensive option for Google specifically: the 25-credit weighting pushes its effective rate near $12/1k, and ScrapingBee gets unpredictable once premium and stealth multipliers stack. cloro is the only row with a clean AI Overview field, and on total delivered cost for parsed Google plus AI Overview it comes out ahead, because the AI Overview parser, citation extraction and PAA hydration are already written.

For the price-only view see Cheapest SERP API 2026; for the full managed-API roundup see Best SERP APIs in 2026.

Decision tree: which Scrape.do alternative to pick

• Cheapest possible per-request rate and you’ll parse the HTML yourself? Decodo, or stay on Scrape.do — they’re the budget, raw-output tier.
• Want proxy-backed scraping with a developer-first API and structured Google endpoints? ScraperAPI.
• Scraping JavaScript-heavy targets that need real headless rendering? ScrapingBee.
• Need enterprise proxy scale and country coverage, not just cheap Google HTML? Bright Data.
• Never wanted to maintain a SERP parser — you just need parsed Google SERPs with AI Overview, plus ChatGPT/Perplexity/Gemini citations through one API? cloro.

The bottom line

Scrape.do sells the cheapest raw-HTML CPM in the SERP-adjacent market, and the best ScrapeDO alternative depends on which half of the trade you actually care about. If you want an even cheaper or comparably cheap raw scraper and you’ll parse the results yourself, Decodo is the like-for-like swap; ScraperAPI and ScrapingBee add structure and rendering at a higher effective rate; Bright Data adds enterprise proxy scale.

If you’re leaving because you never wanted to build and babysit a SERP parser, or because you need AI Overview at all and Scrape.do doesn’t render it, another raw scraper won’t help. cloro returns organic results, ads, AI Overview with citations, and People Also Ask in one self-serve call, across Google and every major AI surface, with a free 500-credit trial you can point at your own keywords first.