Oxylabs Alternatives: 5 Proxy & SERP APIs Tested (2026)

Oxylabs is a proxy-first vendor. The core product is a 100M+ IP residential and datacenter network, and its SERP Scraper API is a parsing layer that rides on top of that infrastructure. That ordering matters: when you buy Oxylabs you’re buying proxies, and the SERP API is the convenience wrapper. It’s exactly right when your problem is proxy access, and more machinery than you need when all you want is parsed Google SERPs returned as clean JSON.

So the teams searching for Oxylabs alternatives in 2026 usually split into two camps. One wants the same proxy scale for less money or less friction, which is a straight infrastructure swap. The other never wanted to manage proxies and parsers at all: they want structured Google SERP data (organic, ads, AI Overview with citations, People Also Ask) as one managed response, and a proxy network is overhead they’d rather not carry.

Picking the right Oxylabs alternative comes down to which of those two problems you actually have. We tested five.

The 5 best Oxylabs alternatives at a glance

Tool	Model	Entry price	Google SERP rate (~1k)	AI Overview
cloro	Parsed AI-native SERP API	$30/mo (free tier: 500 credits/mo)	$1.25–$2.00 /1k (n=10 + AIO)	✅ deep, default
Bright Data	Proxy + SERP layer	PAYG; Business ~$999/mo	~$1–$1.50 /1k (high end)	⚠️ DIY / Web Unlocker
Decodo (ex-Smartproxy)	Budget proxy + SERP API	from ~$0.32 /1k	$0.32–$0.95 /1k	❌ no AIO
ScraperAPI	Credit-based scraper	$49/mo (1k free credits)	25 credits/call ($12 /1k Google)	❌ no AIO
ScrapingBee	Headless-browser scraper	$49/mo (150k credits)	credit-multiplier dependent	❌ no AIO

The five split on two axes that decide an Oxylabs replacement: whether you get parsed SERP JSON or raw access you parse yourself, and whether onboarding is self-serve or gated behind enterprise sales. Oxylabs sits at the proxy-first, parse-it-yourself-at-scale end of both. Each alternative below moves you toward one pole or the other.

How we tested, and what these numbers rest on

Comparison pages are easy to write and hard to trust, so here is the basis for every claim above.

The cloro rows are measured. On 2026-08-19 we ran 15 AI-Overview-prone commercial and informational queries through cloro’s Google endpoint. 14 of the 15 returned a fully parsed AI Overview object, carrying the answer text, a markdown rendering, sources, citationPills, relatedLinks and videos, at a mean of 8.5 sources per overview. That run is the evidence behind cloro’s AI Overview column. One implementation detail if you benchmark us yourself: the field populates only when include.aioverview is sent, and without that flag it is absent whether or not Google rendered an overview, which produces a convincing-looking zero.

The Oxylabs and other vendor rows come from each vendor’s own documentation and pricing pages, linked inline throughout. We did not run those APIs under our own keys for this comparison. So read a ❌ or ⚠️ as “not documented as a first-class parsed field” rather than as a test we ran and they failed. Where a vendor has shipped something since we last checked, their documentation is the authority and this page is not.

Pricing moves and none of these figures are quotes. List prices change without notice and promotional rates are common, so treat the per-1,000 rates as the shape of the market rather than a number to budget against, and open the linked pricing page before you commit.

We make one of the products in this table. cloro is listed first because this is our site, not because a neutral panel ranked it there. The measurements above are reproducible and the competitor links go to primary sources; use both to discount our framing.

What Oxylabs is actually built for

Oxylabs runs one of the largest proxy networks in the industry, 100M+ residential and datacenter IPs, and its SERP Scraper API is layered over that pool. The developer entry point is genuinely self-serve: the SERP Scraper API starts around $49/month at roughly $2 per 1,000 results (up to ~$2.80 per 1,000 at the entry/Micro tier), with JSON responses and country-level geo. But the reputation and most of the revenue live in the enterprise proxy business, and the higher tiers move toward contact-sales, custom IP mixes, and negotiated agreements. That’s the shape to keep in mind: an accessible SERP API bolted onto a proxy company built for scale and compliance.

Where the proxy network earns its keep

For the right workload, nothing on this list swaps in one-for-one:

• Workloads that need a diverse proxy mix (residential, datacenter, mobile, ISP) routed through specific countries.
• Compliance-bound teams that need documented proxy provenance and enterprise agreements.
• High-volume, non-SERP scraping where the IP pool matters as much as the parsing.
• Market-research and brand-protection crawls where proxy scale is the whole point.

If your problem is “we need residential bandwidth at scale through country-specific IPs,” Oxylabs is a category leader and you should keep it.

Where the proxy stack becomes overhead

For a team that only needs parsed Google SERPs, most of that infrastructure is cost you carry without using. The SERP Scraper API parses the classic SERP fields, but AI Overview coverage is thin: citation lists and generative-block extraction aren’t a clean default field the way organic results are. The $49 entry tier is self-serve, but scaling up, or unlocking finer geo and features, pulls you back toward contact-sales and custom pricing. And because results are billed as “successful results” over a proxy network, you keep reasoning about IPs and success rates rather than one flat parsed-SERP call.

That’s the gap the alternatives below close, either by being a cheaper or friendlier proxy, or by removing the proxy-and-parser problem entirely.

The 5 real Oxylabs alternatives, tested

1. cloro — best for parsed, AI-native SERP data

cloro’s SERP API is the inverse of Oxylabs: there’s no proxy product to subscribe to and no parser to build. One endpoint family returns parsed JSON for Google Search and News, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode, plus ChatGPT, Perplexity, Copilot, Gemini, and Grok, with the actual cited source URLs each AI surface used. Where a proxy hands you HTML to parse, cloro returns organic results, ads, AI Overview (with citations), People Also Ask, and related searches in a single response.

That cross-surface coverage is the 2026 differentiator: tracking classic rank without tracking AI citations now misses half the SERP. cloro also fits existing pipelines through n8n, Zapier, LangChain, and MCP, so you plug into a workflow you already run instead of writing custom API glue. Synchronous calls cover single lookups; async/batch with webhook delivery handles large query sets without polling. City-level geotargeting is on every plan, with no separate tier to unlock it.

The 99% success rate above is checkable. Elmo, a brand-visibility product that runs cloro as one of its providers, queries each provider every six hours and publishes the measured success rate and latency in Elmo’s provider comparison. It tracks Oxylabs on the same engines, so you can run the head-to-head yourself. It scores success rate and latency only, not the parsing differences below.

Pros: AI Overview parsed by default (block text plus cited source URLs). One API across Google and every major AI surface. Self-serve signup with a free 500-credit trial. No proxy or parser to maintain. City-level geotargeting at the same per-call price on every plan.

Cons: Focused on search intelligence, so it doesn’t sell a raw proxy pool or ship vertical Maps/Jobs/e-commerce scrapers the way Oxylabs does. Newer than the longest-running proxy vendors.

Pricing: Credit-based from $30/month (Lite, 37,500 credits at $0.80 per 1,000 credits), with Hobby at $100/month for 250,000 credits at $0.40 per 1,000 and rates scaling down to $0.31 per 1,000 on the largest self-serve tier and $0.25 on a custom Enterprise contract. A Google call is 3 credits at n=10, +2 with AI Overview, so n=10 + AIO works out to roughly $1.25–$2.00 per 1,000 calls. See the comparison card above, and the pricing page for full tiers.

2. Bright Data — closest like-for-like proxy + SERP infrastructure

If what you want is the same proxy-first shape as Oxylabs from a different vendor, Bright Data is the nearest match: a 72M+ IP residential network across 195+ countries with a dedicated SERP API riding on top. Like Oxylabs, the proxy stack is the real product and the SERP API is the wrapper. And like Oxylabs, the enterprise posture shows up in onboarding: KYC review, an MSA, and a sales conversation before committed pricing kicks in.

Pros: Proxy scale and country coverage in the same league as Oxylabs. Dedicated SERP API on top. Rigorous compliance and provenance for regulated buyers.

Cons: KYC and an MSA gate the better rates. AI Overview isn’t a clean parsed field; you extract it yourself via Web Unlocker. Business plans land near $999/month.

Pricing: Pay-as-you-go, with the SERP API around $1–$1.50 per 1,000 at the high-volume end; the Business tier lands near $999/month.

3. Decodo (formerly Smartproxy) — cheapest self-serve SERP scraping

Decodo is the budget answer, and the closer spiritual match to Oxylabs’s self-serve tier. It’s a self-serve proxy network with its own SERP Scraping API, and on raw per-request price it undercuts everyone here: the Core tier starts around $0.32 per 1,000 requests, with higher tiers landing near $0.88–$0.95 per 1,000. If your only goal is “the cheapest way to pull Google results at volume” and you’re comfortable parsing them yourself, Decodo is hard to beat on headline rate. (Decodo has no dedicated comparison page on cloro — it’s included here on the merits.)

Pros: Lowest per-request SERP price in this comparison. Self-serve with a 7-day free trial. Genuinely easy to start.

Cons: No structured AI Overview parsing — you handle SERP-element extraction yourself. Smaller ecosystem and documentation than Oxylabs or Bright Data.

Pricing: SERP Scraping API from ~$0.32 per 1,000 (Core) up to ~$0.95 per 1,000 on higher tiers; 7-day free trial (Decodo pricing).

4. ScraperAPI — developer-friendly proxy with structured endpoints

ScraperAPI is closer to a developer product than an enterprise proxy: one API key, proxy rotation and retries handled for you, and structured JSON endpoints for popular targets including Google Search. It’s a strong Oxylabs alternative for teams that want proxy-backed scraping without the enterprise procurement overhead.

The catch is the credit model. Plans are denominated in credits, and difficult targets cost more: Google’s structured-data endpoints bill at 25 credits per request. On the $49/month Hobby plan (100,000 credits) that’s about 4,000 Google SERP calls, an effective rate near $12 per 1,000 for Google specifically. There’s no structured AI Overview field.

Pros: Self-serve, developer-first, with a free 1,000-credit tier and a 7-day trial. Structured Google endpoints (organic, ads, PAA, related) out of the box.

Cons: Credit weighting makes Google SERP calls expensive relative to a flat per-call SERP API. No AI Overview parsing. Costs vary by target difficulty.

Pricing: Hobby $49/month (100,000 credits; Google = 25 credits/call). Free 1,000 credits plus a 7-day trial (ScraperAPI pricing).

5. ScrapingBee — headless-browser scraping for JS-heavy targets

ScrapingBee approaches the problem from the browser side: a headless-browser scraping API that renders JavaScript, rotates proxies, and returns the page. It’s a fit when you’re scraping rendered content across many site types, not just SERPs, though that generality is also the trade, because Google SERP work leans on the credit multipliers.

Plans run from $49/month (Discovery, 150,000 credits) up to Enterprise at $599/month (8M credits), and credits burn faster with rendering options: JavaScript rendering ×5, premium proxy ×25, and stealth proxy up to ×75. There’s a free 1,000-credit trial, and no structured AI Overview field.

Pros: Handles JS-heavy pages and general web scraping well. Self-serve with a free 1,000-credit trial. Broad beyond just Google SERPs.

Cons: Credit multipliers (JS ×5, premium proxy ×25, stealth up to ×75) make hard Google SERP pulls expensive. No AI Overview parsing. Not a purpose-built SERP API.

Pricing: Discovery $49/month (150,000 credits) up to Enterprise $599/month (8M credits); free 1,000-credit trial; credit multipliers apply (ScrapingBee pricing).

Oxylabs alternatives: price and parsing compared

Headline proxy rates mislead, because the number that matters is total delivered cost: the per-1,000 rate plus the engineering you spend turning raw access into parsed SERP rows. A $0.32/1,000 proxy that needs a parser you build and maintain is not cheaper than a $2/1,000 API that returns structured JSON if that parser costs you weeks.

Vendor	Model	Google SERP rate (~1k)	You parse?	AI Overview
cloro	Parsed SERP API	$1.25–$2.00 (n=10 + AIO)	No	✅ default
Oxylabs	Proxy + SERP Scraper API	~$2.00–$2.80 /1k results	No	⚠️ limited
Bright Data	Proxy + SERP layer	~$1–$1.50 (high end)	Mostly	⚠️ DIY / Web Unlocker
Decodo	Budget proxy + SERP API	$0.32–$0.95	Yes	❌
ScraperAPI	Credit scraper	~$12 /1k Google (25 cr/call)	Partial	❌
ScrapingBee	Headless-browser scraper	multiplier-dependent	Partial	❌

Decodo has the cheapest raw rate at $0.32–$0.95/1k, but you parse the SERP yourself and get no AI Overview field. Bright Data is the closest infrastructure swap for Oxylabs, with comparable proxy scale and a SERP layer, though the enterprise sales motion is heavier. On total delivered cost for parsed Google plus AI Overview, cloro comes out lowest, because the AI Overview parser, citation extraction and PAA hydration are already done and there is nothing left for you to build or maintain. Google specifically is most expensive on ScraperAPI, where the 25-credit weighting pushes the effective rate near $12/1k; ScrapingBee’s multipliers land in the same territory on hard pulls.

For the price-only view see Cheapest SERP API 2026; for the full managed-API roundup see Best SERP APIs in 2026.

Migration playbook: Oxylabs → cloro

If you’re moving off Oxylabs specifically to stop maintaining proxies and parsers, the switch is small:

1. Delete the AI Overview detection, PAA hydration, and ad-sitelink parsing you built on top of Oxylabs’s SERP results. cloro returns those as structured fields, so the proxy plus your parser collapses into one endpoint.
2. Billing moves from “successful results” to per-call credits, so you stop reasoning about proxy success rates and result quotas. One credit rate per call, sync by default.
3. Country-level geo becomes city-level on every plan. cloro accepts Google’s canonical geotargets down to city level at the same per-call price, with no upgrade path to unlock it.
4. The same integration that reads Google also reads AI Overview, AI Mode, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Copilot, Gemini, and Grok, so AI-citation tracking is one API, not a second vendor.

What you can’t migrate to cloro: a raw residential/datacenter proxy pool, or scraping of arbitrary non-SERP sites. If that’s your real requirement, keep Oxylabs or move to Bright Data or Decodo. cloro is a SERP API, not a proxy.

Decision tree: which Oxylabs alternative to pick

• Need a raw proxy pool at Oxylabs-class scale, just from a different vendor? Bright Data for enterprise infrastructure, or Decodo for the budget, self-serve tier.
• Cheapest possible per-request rate and you’ll parse the HTML yourself? Decodo.
• Want proxy-backed scraping with a developer-first API and structured Google endpoints? ScraperAPI.
• Scraping JS-heavy pages across many site types, not just SERPs? ScrapingBee.
• Never wanted to manage proxies or parsers — you just need parsed Google SERPs with AI Overview, plus ChatGPT/Perplexity/Gemini citations through one API? cloro.

The bottom line

Oxylabs is a proxy infrastructure company with a SERP Scraper API on the side, and the best Oxylabs alternative depends on which half of that you actually need. If you need the proxies, Bright Data and Decodo are the like-for-like swaps, one at enterprise scale and one at budget. If you want proxy-backed scraping with a friendlier developer experience, ScraperAPI or ScrapingBee fit.

But if the reason you’re leaving is that you never wanted to run proxies and maintain SERP parsers in the first place, another proxy only moves the problem. A parsed SERP API removes it. cloro returns organic results, ads, AI Overview with citations, and People Also Ask in one self-serve call, across Google and every major AI surface, with a free 500-credit trial to baseline your own keywords before you commit.