Peec AI Alternatives: 5 Options and Peec AI Pricing (2026)

The best Peec AI alternatives are OtterlyAI for the lowest entry price ($29 a month), Profound for enterprise programs, Semrush’s AI Visibility plan for teams already on Semrush, Ahrefs Brand Radar for a market-wide view without writing prompts, and cloro if you want the raw AI answers through an API instead of a dashboard. Peec AI itself costs $95, $245 or $495 a month for 50, 150 or 350 prompts on 3 AI models, and its API starts on the $245 plan. We read every price on 2026-11-10.

Peec AI is a good dashboard with a clear price ladder. People look elsewhere for three reasons: they need a fourth engine, they need the API on a smaller budget, or they already report from their own BI and pay for a dashboard they do not open. This page starts with what Peec AI’s own pricing page says, then compares five alternatives on the live list price, the engines each one covers, and how often AI engines name each tool when a buyer asks for one.

The 5 best Peec AI alternatives at a glance

Tool	Best for	AI engines	API	Live list price
OtterlyAI	The lowest entry price	ChatGPT, AI Overviews, Perplexity, Copilot; Gemini, AI Mode and Claude as add-ons	Standard and up	Lite $29/mo (15 prompts)
Profound	Enterprise programs	Up to 9 on Enterprise	Enterprise	Custom (contact required); free 7-day trial
Semrush AI Visibility	Teams already on Semrush	ChatGPT, Google AI, Gemini, Perplexity	Enterprise	Base $99/mo per domain, billed annually (25 prompts)
Ahrefs Brand Radar	A market view without writing prompts	AI Overviews, AI Mode, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot; Claude on custom prompts	Ahrefs API	Custom prompts from $50/mo; AI Visibility Index from $199/mo
cloro	Raw answers in your own pipeline	ChatGPT, Gemini, AI Overview, AI Mode, Bing AI Mode	Every plan	Free (500 credits/mo); Hobby $100/mo for 250,000 credits
Peec AI (incumbent)	A marketing-team dashboard	3 of ChatGPT, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Copilot, Gemini, Naver AI	Pro and up	Starter $95/mo (50 prompts, 3 models)

The first four are dashboards like Peec AI: you add prompts and read charts. cloro is an API: it returns each answer and its sources, and you decide what to compute and where to show it. Choose the shape first, then compare prices inside it.

Peec AI pricing: three models per plan, and the API starts on Pro

Peec AI prices its AI brand monitoring platform by prompts and models, and the price per answer falls at scale. Every plan tracks daily, with unlimited users and competitors (Peec AI pricing, read on 2026-11-10):

Plan	Price, billed monthly	Prompts	Models	Countries	Projects	AI answers a month	API
Starter	$95	50	3	1	1	4,500	No
Pro	$245	150	3	3	2	13,500	Yes
Advanced	$495	350	3	3	5	31,500	Yes
Enterprise	Custom, annual	Unlimited	Up to 13	Unlimited	Unlimited	Unlimited	Yes

Peec AI counts one AI answer as one model’s reply to one prompt on one day, so 50 prompts on 3 models for 30 days is 4,500 answers. Divided out, that is $21.11 per 1,000 answers on Starter, $18.15 on Pro and $15.71 on Advanced (our arithmetic from the plan limits). That price covers the dashboard, sentiment, source analytics, recommended actions and agent credits as well as the answers.

Three details change the bill:

• A fourth model costs extra. One more model is $30 a month on Starter, $70 on Pro and $140 on Advanced. The models you can add are ChatGPT, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Copilot, Perplexity and Gemini.
• Annual billing is 15% off. The pricing page gives the discount in its FAQ but no annual price per plan.
• Countries are capped by plan. Starter covers 1 country, Pro and Advanced cover 3. The FAQ says tracking more countries or languages costs nothing extra, so check the cap on your plan.

The takeaway: at 150 prompts or more, Peec AI’s price per answer falls, but the model cap stays at 3. If you need four or more engines, add the per-model fee before you compare it with the tools below.

Which AI visibility tools do ChatGPT, Gemini and AI Mode name most?

To find out which brands ChatGPT and the other engines recommend in a category, ask them the questions buyers ask, many times, and count the names. cloro does that every week for this category: it asks ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Mode and Bing AI Mode five buyer questions about AI visibility tools, such as “What is the best AI visibility tracking tool?”, from the US. A tool counts as named when its name appears in the answer text. The tables below are mention counts from the public weekly data, with the number of answers beside every figure. The method and each week’s JSON file (CC BY 4.0) are public, for example the week of 2026-11-09.

Tool	Named, week of 2026-11-09	Named, five weeks to 2026-11-09
Profound	17 of 20 answers	84 of 102
OtterlyAI	17 of 20	83 of 102
Peec AI	17 of 20	73 of 102
Ahrefs Brand Radar	6 of 20	42 of 102
Semrush AI toolkit	9 of 20	41 of 102
Rankscale	4 of 20	15 of 102
Scrunch AI	4 of 20	14 of 102
Promptwatch	4 of 20	8 of 102
cloro	0 of 20	0 of 102

Evertune was named in 2 answers that week, and other tools were named once or not at all, too few to read. Before 2026-11-09 the weekly set used Perplexity and Copilot in place of Bing AI Mode, so the five-week column mixes two engine sets.

When a buyer asks an AI engine for a tool in this category, Profound, OtterlyAI and Peec AI each appear in 73 to 84 of the 102 answers, and Semrush’s and Ahrefs’ products in about two answers in five. That is why those four are the alternatives on this page. The counts do not say which tool is better. A mention is a recommendation in one answer, and answers move: in our paired runs the same model answering the same prompt minutes apart repeated only about 40% of its cited domains (sample size study). Read the counts as a five-week pattern, never as one week’s ranking. The list is also a fixed roster of 10 tools, and cloro is one of them. cloro was named in 0 of 102 answers. That fits its product: cloro is an API that dashboards and data teams build on, and buyers ask AI engines for dashboards.

What are the best Peec AI alternatives?

The best Peec AI alternatives are OtterlyAI for the lowest entry price, Profound for enterprise programs, Semrush AI Visibility for Semrush accounts, and Ahrefs Brand Radar for a market-wide index. For raw answers through an API, see cloro in the next section.

01

1. OtterlyAI: best for the lowest entry price

OtterlyAI is the cheapest way into a full AI visibility dashboard: brand visibility, sentiment, citation sources, share of voice and a GEO audit from $29 a month. Against Peec AI, the engine model is the other way round. Otterly includes four engines and sells Gemini, AI Mode and Claude as add-ons, where Peec AI lets you pick 3 from its list. On Standard, 100 prompts on Otterly’s four engines plus Gemini and AI Mode cost $189 + $59 + $59 = $307 a month. Our OtterlyAI alternatives page compares its plans in full.

Pros

• +Lite is $29 a month for 15 prompts on four engines.
• +ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Copilot are on every plan.
• +API and MCP access from Standard, plus a Data Studio connector.
• +Unlimited team members, brands and competitors.

Cons

• −Gemini and Google AI Mode are add-ons: $9, $59 or $149 a month each, by plan.
• −No API on Lite. Standard includes 2,000 API requests a month and Premium 5,000.
• −Lite has one workspace and 3 recommendations a week.

Pricing. Lite $29/month (15 prompts). Standard $189/month (100 prompts). Premium $489/month (400 prompts). Enterprise custom, from 1,000 prompts. 15% off on annual billing.

02

2. Profound: best for enterprise programs

Profound sells to enterprise marketing teams. Its pricing page shows a free trial and a custom Enterprise plan that covers up to nine engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, Gemini, DeepSeek, Claude, Google AI Overviews, Exa Search and Muse Spark), API access and unlimited seats. It also sells AI Marketer agents that run on credits. Against Peec AI, the trade is a sales process and a custom contract for a wider engine set. If you are leaving Peec AI because 3 models are not enough and your budget is enterprise-sized, start here. Our Profound alternatives post compares Profound with the mid-market tools.

Pros

• +Up to 9 engines on Enterprise, including Claude, DeepSeek, Perplexity and Exa Search.
• +API access on Enterprise, with unlimited seats.
• +Free trial: 50 prompts, daily for 7 days, on ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews.
• +Named in 84 of 102 answers in our weekly data, the most of any tracked tool.

Cons

• −No public plan price: Custom (contact required).
• −No API on the trial.

Pricing. Trial free (50 prompts, 7 days). Enterprise Custom (contact required). The FAQ also names a self-serve Agency Growth plan with 400 credits a month per client workspace, with no price shown.

03

3. Semrush AI Visibility: best if you already use Semrush

Semrush sells AI visibility as its own plan. Base is $99 a month per domain, billed annually, for 25 custom prompts with daily AI rankings, AI visibility reports for any domain, AI competitor analysis, prompt research and a site audit for AI readiness. For a team that already does keyword research and rank tracking in Semrush, that keeps AI answers next to the SEO data. Against Peec AI, you get fewer prompts for the price (25 against Peec AI Starter’s 50) and an engine list fixed by Semrush.

Pros

• +Mentions from ChatGPT, Google AI, Gemini and Perplexity.
• +AI competitor analysis and prompt research in the same account as Semrush's SEO data.
• +Daily, weekly and monthly data updates.

Cons

• −Base tracks 25 custom prompts, priced per domain.
• −The listed $99 is the annual-billing price.
• −Custom limits and API access are on the Enterprise plan.

Pricing. Base $99/month per domain, billed annually: 25 custom prompts, 300 AI analysis reports a day. Enterprise custom.

04

4. Ahrefs Brand Radar: best for a market-wide view without writing prompts

Ahrefs Brand Radar works two ways. Custom prompts track the questions you write, daily, like Peec AI. The AI Visibility Index is different: Ahrefs runs prompts built from its keyword database through each engine and stores the answers, so you can look up any brand’s AI visibility without setting anything up. Against Peec AI, the Index answers “where does my market show up” on day one, and custom prompts answer “do we show up for our questions”. Ahrefs says the Index fits established brands best, because it is built from real search demand.

Pros

• +AI Visibility Index of 551 million pre-collected prompts, with no setup.
• +Covers AI Overviews, AI Mode, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Copilot; custom prompts add Claude.
• +Every paid Ahrefs plan includes 5, 10 or 20 daily custom prompts.

Cons

• −The Index re-tests its question sets monthly, on a 90-day reporting window.
• −Ahrefs says the Index works best for brands and topics with search demand.
• −Claude uses 8 checks per update on custom prompts.

Pricing. Custom prompts from $50/month, $699/month for all models. AI Visibility Index from $199/month (83 prompts a day, 2,500 checks a month, $0.020 per check over that).

Build it yourself: the cloro call behind the numbers above

What does it cost to build AI visibility tracking on an API versus buying a platform? The answers cost less on the API, and the reporting is yours to build. Dashboards export CSV (Peec AI on every plan); cloro returns each raw answer as JSON. The tables above come from cloro’s own API: every week a job sends each of the five prompts to four engines and counts the brand names in each answer, and you can run the same thing for your own category. The flow: you send a batch of prompts and engines, cloro runs each one in a logged-out session and returns the answer text and its sources as JSON, and you count mentions and store them wherever you report from.

05

5. cloro: best for raw AI answers in your own pipeline

cloro’s AI visibility tracking API is the layer under a dashboard. It returns what each engine answered and which pages it cited, and nothing on top. That is less than Peec AI gives you, and it is the right amount if you want to define share of voice your own way, join AI answers to CRM or traffic data, or keep the history in your own warehouse.

Pros

• +ChatGPT, Gemini, AI Overview, AI Mode and Bing AI Mode under one key.
• +Each answer comes back with its text and its cited sources.
• +Country set per request, so each market is its own series.
• +Every plan includes the API, Free included.

Cons

• −No dashboard, sentiment scoring or recommendations: you build the reporting.
• −No Perplexity, Copilot or Claude answers.
• −You choose the prompts and the brand list yourself.

Pricing. Free: 500 credits a month. Lite $30/month for 37,500 credits. Hobby $100/month for 250,000 credits. Growth $500/month for 1,350,000 credits. ChatGPT is 5 credits an answer; Gemini, AI Mode and Bing AI Mode are 4.

This creates one task per prompt and engine on the async route, the route the prices on this page use:

import requests

KEY = "YOUR_CLORO_API_KEY"
PROMPTS = [
    "What is the best AI visibility tracking tool?",
    "Which platform tracks AI search rankings for brands?",
]
ENGINES = ["CHATGPT", "GEMINI", "AIMODE", "BING_AIMODE"]

tasks = [
    {"taskType": engine, "payload": {"prompt": prompt, "country": "US"}}
    for prompt in PROMPTS
    for engine in ENGINES
]
r = requests.post(
    "https://api.cloro.dev/v1/async/task/batch",
    headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {KEY}"},
    json=tasks,
    timeout=60,
)
task_ids = [row["task"]["id"] for row in r.json()["results"]]

Each finished task returns the answer in response.text and the cited pages in response.sources[]. Counting a brand is a word-boundary match on the text, the same rule the weekly data uses. Give each brand its other spellings: on this run ChatGPT and Gemini wrote “Otterly.AI”, AI Mode wrote “OtterlyAI” and Bing AI Mode wrote “Otterly AI”.

import re

BRANDS = {
    "Peec AI": ["Peec AI", "Peec.ai"],
    "Profound": ["Profound"],
    "OtterlyAI": ["OtterlyAI", "Otterly.AI", "Otterly AI"],
    "Semrush": ["Semrush"],
    "Ahrefs": ["Ahrefs"],
}

def read_task(task_id):
    t = requests.get(
        f"https://api.cloro.dev/v1/async/task/{task_id}",
        headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {KEY}"},
        timeout=60,
    ).json()
    if t["task"]["status"] != "COMPLETED":
        return None
    text = t["response"]["text"]
    named = [
        brand for brand, names in BRANDS.items()
        if any(re.search(rf"\b{re.escape(n)}\b", text) for n in names)
    ]
    sources = [s["url"] for s in t["response"]["sources"]]
    return named, sources

On 2026-11-10 one run of “What is the best AI visibility tracking tool?” on the four engines cost 17 credits: 5 for ChatGPT and 4 each for Gemini, AI Mode and Bing AI Mode. ChatGPT named Peec AI, Profound, OtterlyAI, Semrush and Ahrefs and cited 23 sources. Pass a webhook URL with each task if you would rather have results pushed than poll for them. A synchronous call to /v1/monitor/<engine> returns the same answer in one request and adds 2 credits.

What it costs next to Peec AI, for the same daily schedule on ChatGPT, Gemini and AI Mode (13 credits a prompt a day):

Workload	Peec AI	cloro credits a month	cloro plan that covers it
50 prompts, 3 engines, daily	Starter, $95	19,500	Lite, $30
150 prompts, 3 engines, daily	Pro, $245	58,500	Hobby, $100
350 prompts, 3 engines, daily	Advanced, $495	136,500	Hobby, $100

The takeaway: the answers are the cheap part. What Peec AI’s price buys on top is the dashboard, sentiment, recommendations and the time your team does not spend building them. If you have a data person and a BI tool, building is cheaper. If you do not, a dashboard is. Our build vs buy guide works through that decision.

Which Peec AI alternative to pick

Background

How we compared, and what these numbers rest on

+

Vendor prices and features come from each vendor’s own pricing page, read on 2026-11-10 and linked above. We did not run Peec AI, OtterlyAI, Profound, Semrush or Ahrefs under our own accounts for this page. Where a vendor has changed a plan since, its page is the authority and this one is not.

The price per answer is our arithmetic. For Peec AI we divided the plan price by the AI answers its pricing page lists. For cloro we multiplied the credits per answer in our published pricing by the plan rate per 1,000 credits ($0.40 on Hobby). The two are not the same product: Peec AI’s figure includes a dashboard and analysis, cloro’s is the answer only.

The mention counts are first-party. cloro’s weekly job asks ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Mode and Bing AI Mode five fixed prompts from the US and counts names by word-boundary match, with no model judging. Five prompts are a small sample, which is why every figure above carries its answer count and why tools named once or twice get no figure.

We make one of the products on this page. cloro is listed last because it is a different kind of tool, not because a panel ranked it there. It was named in none of the answers we counted.